This sentence seems a bit dogmatic, but in reality, most people do not criticize others correctly. Two hours before the end of get off work, the leader came over and said: What is this survey doing? It's a waste of time to be vague. You have been frightened. At this category email list moment, the self-protection mechanism in your heart is activated, and you are in a state of category email list being invaded. No matter what rectification method he says, it is not important. If I am right, the inner waves reflect two physiological reactions: As you wish talk back directly The first: Psychology professor.
Shelley Taylor said that obedience is a "belief" in an "authority" that has the right to demand, while human needs are a desire for reward and avoidance of punishment ; so category email list the brain is suddenly awakened and will be fully integrated Consider factors such as environment and interests and stop losses in time. The second: the leader does not give himself room in public, and does not respect himself at all; if he feels offended, since it is a collaborative relationship, he category email list should not be emotional, why should he be concerned about him? right? The resulting situation can be imagined. But I think these situations can be understood, after all, everyone has experienced it, big and small.
After the incident, the friends around you will advise you not to have the same knowledge as the leader, don't take it to heart, and finally let you take the initiative category email list to apologize and thank the leader for guidance... In my opinion, the occurrence of various situations is the result of "not being able to criticize others correctly". How can we category email list do this effectively? Generally, the "sugar-coated cannonball" rule is used , that is, a slap to the candy bar. But adults are already weak on this routine, so is there any other way? Let us re-understand the matter of "criticism".